Cambios
En el instante 9 de mayo de 2025, 8:23:36 UTC,

-
Añadido recurso README.txt a Índice exhaustivo de valoración de la biodiversidad amenazada
f | 1 | { | f | 1 | { |
2 | "Observaciones": { | 2 | "Observaciones": { | ||
3 | "en": "Recommended citation: D\u00edaz Esteban, Mario; | 3 | "en": "Recommended citation: D\u00edaz Esteban, Mario; | ||
4 | Concepci\u00f3n, Elena D.; Oviedo Pro, Jos\u00e9 Luis; Caparr\u00f3s | 4 | Concepci\u00f3n, Elena D.; Oviedo Pro, Jos\u00e9 Luis; Caparr\u00f3s | ||
5 | Gass, Alejandro; \u00c1lvarez Farizo, Bego\u00f1a; Campos | 5 | Gass, Alejandro; \u00c1lvarez Farizo, Bego\u00f1a; Campos | ||
6 | Palac\u00edn, Pablo; 2019; A comprehensive index for threatened | 6 | Palac\u00edn, Pablo; 2019; A comprehensive index for threatened | ||
7 | biodiversity valuation [Dataset]; Dryad; | 7 | biodiversity valuation [Dataset]; Dryad; | ||
8 | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg79cnp78", | 8 | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg79cnp78", | ||
9 | "es": "Cita recomendada: D\u00edaz Esteban, Mario; | 9 | "es": "Cita recomendada: D\u00edaz Esteban, Mario; | ||
10 | Concepci\u00f3n, Elena D.; Oviedo Pro, Jos\u00e9 Luis; Caparr\u00f3s | 10 | Concepci\u00f3n, Elena D.; Oviedo Pro, Jos\u00e9 Luis; Caparr\u00f3s | ||
11 | Gass, Alejandro; \u00c1lvarez Farizo, Bego\u00f1a; Campos | 11 | Gass, Alejandro; \u00c1lvarez Farizo, Bego\u00f1a; Campos | ||
12 | Palac\u00edn, Pablo; 2019; A comprehensive index for threatened | 12 | Palac\u00edn, Pablo; 2019; A comprehensive index for threatened | ||
13 | biodiversity valuation [Dataset]; Dryad; | 13 | biodiversity valuation [Dataset]; Dryad; | ||
14 | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg79cnp78" | 14 | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg79cnp78" | ||
15 | }, | 15 | }, | ||
16 | "author": null, | 16 | "author": null, | ||
17 | "author_email": null, | 17 | "author_email": null, | ||
18 | "autor": { | 18 | "autor": { | ||
19 | "en": [ | 19 | "en": [ | ||
20 | "Mario D\u00edaz Esteban", | 20 | "Mario D\u00edaz Esteban", | ||
21 | "Elena D. Concepci\u00f3n", | 21 | "Elena D. Concepci\u00f3n", | ||
22 | "Jos\u00e9 Luis Oviedo Pro", | 22 | "Jos\u00e9 Luis Oviedo Pro", | ||
23 | "Alejandro Caparr\u00f3s Gass", | 23 | "Alejandro Caparr\u00f3s Gass", | ||
24 | "Bego\u00f1a \u00c1lvarez Farizo", | 24 | "Bego\u00f1a \u00c1lvarez Farizo", | ||
25 | "Pablo Campos Palac\u00edn" | 25 | "Pablo Campos Palac\u00edn" | ||
26 | ], | 26 | ], | ||
27 | "es": [ | 27 | "es": [ | ||
28 | "Mario D\u00edaz Esteban", | 28 | "Mario D\u00edaz Esteban", | ||
29 | "Elena D. Concepci\u00f3n", | 29 | "Elena D. Concepci\u00f3n", | ||
30 | "Jos\u00e9 Luis Oviedo Pro", | 30 | "Jos\u00e9 Luis Oviedo Pro", | ||
31 | "Alejandro Caparr\u00f3s Gass", | 31 | "Alejandro Caparr\u00f3s Gass", | ||
32 | "Bego\u00f1a \u00c1lvarez Farizo", | 32 | "Bego\u00f1a \u00c1lvarez Farizo", | ||
33 | "Pablo Campos Palac\u00edn" | 33 | "Pablo Campos Palac\u00edn" | ||
34 | ] | 34 | ] | ||
35 | }, | 35 | }, | ||
36 | "conforms_to": [], | 36 | "conforms_to": [], | ||
37 | "coverage_new": {}, | 37 | "coverage_new": {}, | ||
38 | "creator_user_id": "196556b3-e0c4-4c51-a9e6-f51cc752bc37", | 38 | "creator_user_id": "196556b3-e0c4-4c51-a9e6-f51cc752bc37", | ||
39 | "description": { | 39 | "description": { | ||
40 | "en": "\tWe present a new comprehensive index for mapping the | 40 | "en": "\tWe present a new comprehensive index for mapping the | ||
41 | relative conservation value of threatened biodiversity. The index is | 41 | relative conservation value of threatened biodiversity. The index is | ||
42 | based on explicit criteria to (1) select threatened species according | 42 | based on explicit criteria to (1) select threatened species according | ||
43 | to regional government responsibility for species\u2019 conservation; | 43 | to regional government responsibility for species\u2019 conservation; | ||
44 | (2) combine species\u2019 presence by means of weighting factors based | 44 | (2) combine species\u2019 presence by means of weighting factors based | ||
45 | on differences in threat status, sensitivity to disturbance, | 45 | on differences in threat status, sensitivity to disturbance, | ||
46 | functional role, and amount of knowledge; and (3) map species | 46 | functional role, and amount of knowledge; and (3) map species | ||
47 | distributions at the scale of 1 km\u00d71 km UTM squares or lower from | 47 | distributions at the scale of 1 km\u00d71 km UTM squares or lower from | ||
48 | the information available. We tested the performance of the index in | 48 | the information available. We tested the performance of the index in | ||
49 | the forest of Andalusia (southern Spain), an extensive European region | 49 | the forest of Andalusia (southern Spain), an extensive European region | ||
50 | of 87,268 km2, with 43,864 km2 (ca. 50%) classified as forest | 50 | of 87,268 km2, with 43,864 km2 (ca. 50%) classified as forest | ||
51 | habitats. All species included in the Annexes of the European Birds | 51 | habitats. All species included in the Annexes of the European Birds | ||
52 | and Habitats Directives inhabiting the target area, plus the | 52 | and Habitats Directives inhabiting the target area, plus the | ||
53 | regionally endemic species either \u2018Critically Endangered\u2019 or | 53 | regionally endemic species either \u2018Critically Endangered\u2019 or | ||
54 | \u2018Endangered\u2019 not (yet) covered by the Directives were | 54 | \u2018Endangered\u2019 not (yet) covered by the Directives were | ||
55 | selected. The final list included 224 species: 81 plants, 76 birds, 31 | 55 | selected. The final list included 224 species: 81 plants, 76 birds, 31 | ||
56 | mammals, 22 arthropods, six reptiles, five amphibians, and three | 56 | mammals, 22 arthropods, six reptiles, five amphibians, and three | ||
57 | mollusks. Fine-scale distribution maps were available for 108 species | 57 | mollusks. Fine-scale distribution maps were available for 108 species | ||
58 | (48%). The remaining maps were downscaled from published 10 km\u00d710 | 58 | (48%). The remaining maps were downscaled from published 10 km\u00d710 | ||
59 | km UTM maps using knowledge on species\u2019 habitat requirements and | 59 | km UTM maps using knowledge on species\u2019 habitat requirements and | ||
60 | land-use maps. We overlapped the fine-scale maps with the 86,546 | 60 | land-use maps. We overlapped the fine-scale maps with the 86,546 | ||
61 | forest tiles of the Andalusian Forest Map and weighted presences by a | 61 | forest tiles of the Andalusian Forest Map and weighted presences by a | ||
62 | factor of relative conservation estimated for each species to obtain | 62 | factor of relative conservation estimated for each species to obtain | ||
63 | an index of the relative conservation of each forest tile. Index | 63 | an index of the relative conservation of each forest tile. Index | ||
64 | values were higher in protected areas, and in different forest | 64 | values were higher in protected areas, and in different forest | ||
65 | habitats according to expected numbers of endangered species. Index | 65 | habitats according to expected numbers of endangered species. Index | ||
66 | values were correlated with the existence value of threatened species, | 66 | values were correlated with the existence value of threatened species, | ||
67 | but the index underestimate existence values especially for the most | 67 | but the index underestimate existence values especially for the most | ||
68 | valuable tiles. The proposed index allows mapping the relative | 68 | valuable tiles. The proposed index allows mapping the relative | ||
69 | conservation value of threatened biodiversity by integrating knowledge | 69 | conservation value of threatened biodiversity by integrating knowledge | ||
70 | on all threatened species into a single variable. Integration is based | 70 | on all threatened species into a single variable. Integration is based | ||
71 | on explicit methodological criteria for species selection, combination | 71 | on explicit methodological criteria for species selection, combination | ||
72 | of relative conservation values, and estimation of downscaled maps. | 72 | of relative conservation values, and estimation of downscaled maps. | ||
73 | Accurate mapping and synthetic summary of compulsory data on the | 73 | Accurate mapping and synthetic summary of compulsory data on the | ||
74 | conservation status of all species present in a territory advise its | 74 | conservation status of all species present in a territory advise its | ||
75 | extended use for threatened biodiversity valuation in both Europe and | 75 | extended use for threatened biodiversity valuation in both Europe and | ||
76 | elsewhere.", | 76 | elsewhere.", | ||
77 | "es": "Presentamos un nuevo \u00edndice exhaustivo para | 77 | "es": "Presentamos un nuevo \u00edndice exhaustivo para | ||
78 | cartografiar el valor relativo de la biodiversidad amenazada en cuanto | 78 | cartografiar el valor relativo de la biodiversidad amenazada en cuanto | ||
79 | a conservaci\u00f3n se refiere. El \u00edndice se basa en criterios | 79 | a conservaci\u00f3n se refiere. El \u00edndice se basa en criterios | ||
80 | expl\u00edcitos para (1) seleccionar especies amenazadas seg\u00fan la | 80 | expl\u00edcitos para (1) seleccionar especies amenazadas seg\u00fan la | ||
81 | responsabilidad del gobierno regional en su conservaci\u00f3n; (2) | 81 | responsabilidad del gobierno regional en su conservaci\u00f3n; (2) | ||
82 | combinar la presencia de especies mediante factores de | 82 | combinar la presencia de especies mediante factores de | ||
83 | ponderaci\u00f3n basados en diferencias en el estado de amenaza, la | 83 | ponderaci\u00f3n basados en diferencias en el estado de amenaza, la | ||
84 | sensibilidad a las perturbaciones, el papel funcional y la cantidad de | 84 | sensibilidad a las perturbaciones, el papel funcional y la cantidad de | ||
85 | conocimientos disponibles; y (3) cartografiar la distribuci\u00f3n de | 85 | conocimientos disponibles; y (3) cartografiar la distribuci\u00f3n de | ||
86 | las especies a escala de cuadr\u00edculas UTM de 1 km\u00d71 km o | 86 | las especies a escala de cuadr\u00edculas UTM de 1 km\u00d71 km o | ||
87 | inferior a partir de la informaci\u00f3n disponible. Hemos probado el | 87 | inferior a partir de la informaci\u00f3n disponible. Hemos probado el | ||
88 | rendimiento del \u00edndice en los bosques de Andaluc\u00eda (sur de | 88 | rendimiento del \u00edndice en los bosques de Andaluc\u00eda (sur de | ||
89 | Espa\u00f1a), una extensa regi\u00f3n europea de 87 268 km\u00b2, de | 89 | Espa\u00f1a), una extensa regi\u00f3n europea de 87 268 km\u00b2, de | ||
90 | los cuales 43 864 km\u00b2 (aproximadamente el 50 %) est\u00e1n | 90 | los cuales 43 864 km\u00b2 (aproximadamente el 50 %) est\u00e1n | ||
91 | clasificados como h\u00e1bitats forestales. Se seleccionaron todas las | 91 | clasificados como h\u00e1bitats forestales. Se seleccionaron todas las | ||
92 | especies incluidas en los anexos de las directivas europeas de aves y | 92 | especies incluidas en los anexos de las directivas europeas de aves y | ||
93 | h\u00e1bitats que habitan en la zona de estudio, adem\u00e1s de las | 93 | h\u00e1bitats que habitan en la zona de estudio, adem\u00e1s de las | ||
94 | especies end\u00e9micas regionales \u00abEn Peligro Cr\u00edtico\u00bb | 94 | especies end\u00e9micas regionales \u00abEn Peligro Cr\u00edtico\u00bb | ||
95 | o \u00abEn Peligro\u00bb que no est\u00e1n a\u00fan cubiertas por las | 95 | o \u00abEn Peligro\u00bb que no est\u00e1n a\u00fan cubiertas por las | ||
96 | directivas. La lista final inclu\u00eda 224 especies: 81 plantas, 76 | 96 | directivas. La lista final inclu\u00eda 224 especies: 81 plantas, 76 | ||
97 | aves, 31 mam\u00edferos, 22 artr\u00f3podos, seis reptiles, cinco | 97 | aves, 31 mam\u00edferos, 22 artr\u00f3podos, seis reptiles, cinco | ||
98 | anfibios y tres moluscos. Se dispon\u00eda de mapas de | 98 | anfibios y tres moluscos. Se dispon\u00eda de mapas de | ||
99 | distribuci\u00f3n a escala fina de 108 especies (el 48 %). Los mapas | 99 | distribuci\u00f3n a escala fina de 108 especies (el 48 %). Los mapas | ||
100 | restantes se obtuvieron a partir de mapas UTM de 10 km \u00d7 10 km | 100 | restantes se obtuvieron a partir de mapas UTM de 10 km \u00d7 10 km | ||
101 | publicados, utilizando conocimientos sobre los requisitos de | 101 | publicados, utilizando conocimientos sobre los requisitos de | ||
102 | h\u00e1bitat de las especies y mapas de uso del suelo. Superpusimos | 102 | h\u00e1bitat de las especies y mapas de uso del suelo. Superpusimos | ||
103 | los mapas a escala fina con las 86 546 fichas forestales del Mapa | 103 | los mapas a escala fina con las 86 546 fichas forestales del Mapa | ||
104 | Forestal de Andaluc\u00eda y ponderamos las presencias por un factor | 104 | Forestal de Andaluc\u00eda y ponderamos las presencias por un factor | ||
105 | de conservaci\u00f3n relativa estimado para cada especie para obtener | 105 | de conservaci\u00f3n relativa estimado para cada especie para obtener | ||
106 | un \u00edndice que refleje la conservaci\u00f3n relativa de cada | 106 | un \u00edndice que refleje la conservaci\u00f3n relativa de cada | ||
107 | parcela forestal. Los valores del \u00edndice fueron mayores en las | 107 | parcela forestal. Los valores del \u00edndice fueron mayores en las | ||
108 | \u00e1reas protegidas y en distintos h\u00e1bitats forestales | 108 | \u00e1reas protegidas y en distintos h\u00e1bitats forestales | ||
109 | seg\u00fan las expectativas de n\u00famero de especies amenazadas. Los | 109 | seg\u00fan las expectativas de n\u00famero de especies amenazadas. Los | ||
110 | valores del \u00edndice estaban relacionados con el valor de | 110 | valores del \u00edndice estaban relacionados con el valor de | ||
111 | existencia de especies amenazadas, pero el \u00edndice infravaloraba | 111 | existencia de especies amenazadas, pero el \u00edndice infravaloraba | ||
112 | los valores de existencia, especialmente para las fichas m\u00e1s | 112 | los valores de existencia, especialmente para las fichas m\u00e1s | ||
113 | valiosas. El \u00edndice propuesto permite cartografiar el valor de | 113 | valiosas. El \u00edndice propuesto permite cartografiar el valor de | ||
114 | conservaci\u00f3n relativo de la biodiversidad amenazada al integrar | 114 | conservaci\u00f3n relativo de la biodiversidad amenazada al integrar | ||
115 | el conocimiento de todas las especies amenazadas en una \u00fanica | 115 | el conocimiento de todas las especies amenazadas en una \u00fanica | ||
116 | variable. La integraci\u00f3n se basa en criterios metodol\u00f3gicos | 116 | variable. La integraci\u00f3n se basa en criterios metodol\u00f3gicos | ||
117 | expl\u00edcitos para la selecci\u00f3n de especies, la | 117 | expl\u00edcitos para la selecci\u00f3n de especies, la | ||
118 | combinaci\u00f3n de valores de conservaci\u00f3n relativos y la | 118 | combinaci\u00f3n de valores de conservaci\u00f3n relativos y la | ||
119 | estimaci\u00f3n de mapas reducidos. Gracias a la cartograf\u00eda | 119 | estimaci\u00f3n de mapas reducidos. Gracias a la cartograf\u00eda | ||
120 | precisa y al resumen sint\u00e9tico de los datos obligatorios sobre el | 120 | precisa y al resumen sint\u00e9tico de los datos obligatorios sobre el | ||
121 | estado de conservaci\u00f3n de todas las especies presentes en un | 121 | estado de conservaci\u00f3n de todas las especies presentes en un | ||
122 | territorio, se recomienda su uso extendido para valorar la | 122 | territorio, se recomienda su uso extendido para valorar la | ||
123 | biodiversidad amenazada en Europa y en el resto del mundo." | 123 | biodiversidad amenazada en Europa y en el resto del mundo." | ||
124 | }, | 124 | }, | ||
125 | "groups": [], | 125 | "groups": [], | ||
126 | "id": "ea953713-5125-457b-a37a-eae6c5280463", | 126 | "id": "ea953713-5125-457b-a37a-eae6c5280463", | ||
127 | "identifier": "http://hdl.handle.net/10261/239055", | 127 | "identifier": "http://hdl.handle.net/10261/239055", | ||
128 | "instituto": [ | 128 | "instituto": [ | ||
129 | "Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes P\u00fablicos (IPP), CSIC" | 129 | "Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes P\u00fablicos (IPP), CSIC" | ||
130 | ], | 130 | ], | ||
131 | "international_spatial_translated": { | 131 | "international_spatial_translated": { | ||
132 | "en": "", | 132 | "en": "", | ||
133 | "es": "" | 133 | "es": "" | ||
134 | }, | 134 | }, | ||
135 | "isopen": false, | 135 | "isopen": false, | ||
136 | "issued_date": "2019-11-27T00:00:00", | 136 | "issued_date": "2019-11-27T00:00:00", | ||
137 | "language": [ | 137 | "language": [ | ||
138 | "en" | 138 | "en" | ||
139 | ], | 139 | ], | ||
140 | "license_id": | 140 | "license_id": | ||
141 | "\thttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/", | 141 | "\thttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/", | ||
142 | "license_title": | 142 | "license_title": | ||
143 | "\thttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/", | 143 | "\thttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/", | ||
144 | "maintainer": null, | 144 | "maintainer": null, | ||
145 | "maintainer_email": null, | 145 | "maintainer_email": null, | ||
146 | "metadata_created": "2025-05-09T08:21:08.701163", | 146 | "metadata_created": "2025-05-09T08:21:08.701163", | ||
n | 147 | "metadata_modified": "2025-05-09T08:21:08.701167", | n | 147 | "metadata_modified": "2025-05-09T08:23:36.314940", |
148 | "multilingual_tags": { | 148 | "multilingual_tags": { | ||
149 | "en": [ | 149 | "en": [ | ||
150 | "Biodiversity", | 150 | "Biodiversity", | ||
151 | "Environmental preservation" | 151 | "Environmental preservation" | ||
152 | ], | 152 | ], | ||
153 | "es": [ | 153 | "es": [ | ||
154 | "Biodiversidad", | 154 | "Biodiversidad", | ||
155 | "Conservaci\u00f3n ambiental" | 155 | "Conservaci\u00f3n ambiental" | ||
156 | ] | 156 | ] | ||
157 | }, | 157 | }, | ||
158 | "name": | 158 | "name": | ||
159 | "indice-exhaustivo-de-valoracion-de-la-biodiversidad-amenazada", | 159 | "indice-exhaustivo-de-valoracion-de-la-biodiversidad-amenazada", | ||
160 | "notes": null, | 160 | "notes": null, | ||
n | 161 | "num_resources": 0, | n | 161 | "num_resources": 1, |
162 | "num_tags": 0, | 162 | "num_tags": 0, | ||
163 | "organization": { | 163 | "organization": { | ||
164 | "approval_status": "approved", | 164 | "approval_status": "approved", | ||
165 | "created": "2025-04-15T15:18:43.186369", | 165 | "created": "2025-04-15T15:18:43.186369", | ||
166 | "description": "Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de | 166 | "description": "Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de | ||
167 | Investigaciones Cient\u00edficas", | 167 | Investigaciones Cient\u00edficas", | ||
168 | "id": "e0fb512f-fa1e-43d9-ba1e-22b1f834702e", | 168 | "id": "e0fb512f-fa1e-43d9-ba1e-22b1f834702e", | ||
169 | "image_url": "2025-04-15-131843.179987csic.png", | 169 | "image_url": "2025-04-15-131843.179987csic.png", | ||
170 | "is_organization": true, | 170 | "is_organization": true, | ||
171 | "name": | 171 | "name": | ||
172 | agencia-estatal-consejo-superior-de-investigaciones-cientificas-csic", | 172 | agencia-estatal-consejo-superior-de-investigaciones-cientificas-csic", | ||
173 | "state": "active", | 173 | "state": "active", | ||
174 | "title": "CSIC", | 174 | "title": "CSIC", | ||
175 | "type": "organization" | 175 | "type": "organization" | ||
176 | }, | 176 | }, | ||
177 | "owner_org": "e0fb512f-fa1e-43d9-ba1e-22b1f834702e", | 177 | "owner_org": "e0fb512f-fa1e-43d9-ba1e-22b1f834702e", | ||
178 | "private": false, | 178 | "private": false, | ||
179 | "proyecto": { | 179 | "proyecto": { | ||
180 | "en": [ | 180 | "en": [ | ||
181 | "eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de | 181 | "eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de | ||
182 | Investigaci\u00f3n Cient\u00edfica y T\u00e9cnica y de Innovaci\u00f3n | 182 | Investigaci\u00f3n Cient\u00edfica y T\u00e9cnica y de Innovaci\u00f3n | ||
183 | 2013-2016/ECO2013-42110-P" | 183 | 2013-2016/ECO2013-42110-P" | ||
184 | ], | 184 | ], | ||
185 | "es": [ | 185 | "es": [ | ||
186 | "eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de | 186 | "eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de | ||
187 | Investigaci\u00f3n Cient\u00edfica y T\u00e9cnica y de Innovaci\u00f3n | 187 | Investigaci\u00f3n Cient\u00edfica y T\u00e9cnica y de Innovaci\u00f3n | ||
188 | 2013-2016/ECO2013-42110-P" | 188 | 2013-2016/ECO2013-42110-P" | ||
189 | ] | 189 | ] | ||
190 | }, | 190 | }, | ||
191 | "publisher": "b627d71d-2315-4e75-afc9-897da84459f0", | 191 | "publisher": "b627d71d-2315-4e75-afc9-897da84459f0", | ||
192 | "reference": [ | 192 | "reference": [ | ||
193 | "http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220508" | 193 | "http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220508" | ||
194 | ], | 194 | ], | ||
195 | "relationships_as_object": [], | 195 | "relationships_as_object": [], | ||
196 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | 196 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | ||
t | 197 | "resources": [], | t | 197 | "resources": [ |
198 | { | ||||
199 | "byte_size": "3,25 kB", | ||||
200 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||||
201 | "cache_url": null, | ||||
202 | "created": "2025-05-09T08:23:36.321200", | ||||
203 | "datastore_active": false, | ||||
204 | "description": null, | ||||
205 | "format": "txt", | ||||
206 | "hash": "", | ||||
207 | "id": "377380f1-1529-4dc2-ad0e-844ab511cc87", | ||||
208 | "last_modified": null, | ||||
209 | "metadata_modified": "2025-05-09T08:23:36.318116", | ||||
210 | "mimetype": "text/plain", | ||||
211 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||||
212 | "name": "README.txt", | ||||
213 | "name_translated": { | ||||
214 | "en": "README.txt", | ||||
215 | "es": "README.txt" | ||||
216 | }, | ||||
217 | "package_id": "ea953713-5125-457b-a37a-eae6c5280463", | ||||
218 | "position": 0, | ||||
219 | "resource_identifier": | ||||
220 | "https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/239055/4/README.txt", | ||||
221 | "resource_relation": [], | ||||
222 | "resource_relation-1": "", | ||||
223 | "resource_type": null, | ||||
224 | "size": null, | ||||
225 | "state": "active", | ||||
226 | "url": | ||||
227 | "https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/239055/4/README.txt", | ||||
228 | "url_type": null | ||||
229 | } | ||||
230 | ], | ||||
198 | "spatial": [ | 231 | "spatial": [ | ||
199 | 232 | ||||
200 | ://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Autonomia/Andalucia" | 233 | ://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Autonomia/Andalucia" | ||
201 | ], | 234 | ], | ||
202 | "state": "draft", | 235 | "state": "draft", | ||
203 | "tags": [], | 236 | "tags": [], | ||
204 | "theme": [ | 237 | "theme": [ | ||
205 | 238 | ||||
206 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/ciencia-tecnologia", | 239 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/ciencia-tecnologia", | ||
207 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/medio-ambiente" | 240 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/medio-ambiente" | ||
208 | ], | 241 | ], | ||
209 | "title": "\u00cdndice exhaustivo de valoraci\u00f3n de la | 242 | "title": "\u00cdndice exhaustivo de valoraci\u00f3n de la | ||
210 | biodiversidad amenazada", | 243 | biodiversidad amenazada", | ||
211 | "title_translated": { | 244 | "title_translated": { | ||
212 | "en": "A comprehensive index for threatened biodiversity | 245 | "en": "A comprehensive index for threatened biodiversity | ||
213 | valuation", | 246 | valuation", | ||
214 | "es": "\u00cdndice exhaustivo de valoraci\u00f3n de la | 247 | "es": "\u00cdndice exhaustivo de valoraci\u00f3n de la | ||
215 | biodiversidad amenazada" | 248 | biodiversidad amenazada" | ||
216 | }, | 249 | }, | ||
217 | "type": "dataset", | 250 | "type": "dataset", | ||
218 | "url": null, | 251 | "url": null, | ||
219 | "version": null | 252 | "version": null | ||
220 | } | 253 | } |