Changes
On May 30, 2024 at 3:07:39 PM UTC,
-
Added resource Appraising_screening_making_risk_in-visible_dataset.pdf to Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing the pill
| f | 1 | { | f | 1 | { |
| 2 | "author": null, | 2 | "author": null, | ||
| 3 | "author_email": null, | 3 | "author_email": null, | ||
| 4 | "conforms_to": [], | 4 | "conforms_to": [], | ||
| 5 | "coverage_new": {}, | 5 | "coverage_new": {}, | ||
| 6 | "creator_user_id": "196556b3-e0c4-4c51-a9e6-f51cc752bc37", | 6 | "creator_user_id": "196556b3-e0c4-4c51-a9e6-f51cc752bc37", | ||
| 7 | "description": { | 7 | "description": { | ||
| 8 | "en": "Non-rare thrombophilias (NRT) are hereditary | 8 | "en": "Non-rare thrombophilias (NRT) are hereditary | ||
| 9 | predispositions to thromboembolism, the most severe side-effect of | 9 | predispositions to thromboembolism, the most severe side-effect of | ||
| 10 | hormonal contraception. In the mid-1990s, the identification of NRT | 10 | hormonal contraception. In the mid-1990s, the identification of NRT | ||
| 11 | stirred up a controversy over the possibility of investigating these | 11 | stirred up a controversy over the possibility of investigating these | ||
| 12 | genetic variants in women wishing to use contraception. Appraising how | 12 | genetic variants in women wishing to use contraception. Appraising how | ||
| 13 | to handle this test led the medical profession to reconfigure the risk | 13 | to handle this test led the medical profession to reconfigure the risk | ||
| 14 | visibility on hormonal contraception. Through a review of scientific | 14 | visibility on hormonal contraception. Through a review of scientific | ||
| 15 | literature, this paper reconstructs the debate over whether and how | 15 | literature, this paper reconstructs the debate over whether and how | ||
| 16 | NRT genetic tests should enter the distribution system of | 16 | NRT genetic tests should enter the distribution system of | ||
| 17 | pharmacological contraception. The main arguments concern their | 17 | pharmacological contraception. The main arguments concern their | ||
| 18 | epidemiological, social, economic, and clinical consequences of these | 18 | epidemiological, social, economic, and clinical consequences of these | ||
| 19 | risk factors. We analyze this debate as a process consisting in | 19 | risk factors. We analyze this debate as a process consisting in | ||
| 20 | shaping the risk visibility. To those who opt for selective | 20 | shaping the risk visibility. To those who opt for selective | ||
| 21 | thrombophilia screening, this test should become a part of the medical | 21 | thrombophilia screening, this test should become a part of the medical | ||
| 22 | decision-making process, and its visibility should be kept under | 22 | decision-making process, and its visibility should be kept under | ||
| 23 | medical control to protect contraception safety. To advocates of | 23 | medical control to protect contraception safety. To advocates of | ||
| 24 | universal or \u201cextended\u201d screening, NRT visibility becomes a | 24 | universal or \u201cextended\u201d screening, NRT visibility becomes a | ||
| 25 | moral/legal obligation, and the test a valuable, if not mandatory, | 25 | moral/legal obligation, and the test a valuable, if not mandatory, | ||
| 26 | means to assure contraception safety. Risk visibility reveals | 26 | means to assure contraception safety. Risk visibility reveals | ||
| 27 | assumptions about medical power, women\u2019s responsibility, and drug | 27 | assumptions about medical power, women\u2019s responsibility, and drug | ||
| 28 | safety, and points to an appraisal process as an ideal field to | 28 | safety, and points to an appraisal process as an ideal field to | ||
| 29 | explore political and epistemological implications of screening.", | 29 | explore political and epistemological implications of screening.", | ||
| 30 | "es": "Non-rare thrombophilias (NRT) are hereditary | 30 | "es": "Non-rare thrombophilias (NRT) are hereditary | ||
| 31 | predispositions to thromboembolism, the most severe side-effect of | 31 | predispositions to thromboembolism, the most severe side-effect of | ||
| 32 | hormonal contraception. In the mid-1990s, the identification of NRT | 32 | hormonal contraception. In the mid-1990s, the identification of NRT | ||
| 33 | stirred up a controversy over the possibility of investigating these | 33 | stirred up a controversy over the possibility of investigating these | ||
| 34 | genetic variants in women wishing to use contraception. Appraising how | 34 | genetic variants in women wishing to use contraception. Appraising how | ||
| 35 | to handle this test led the medical profession to reconfigure the risk | 35 | to handle this test led the medical profession to reconfigure the risk | ||
| 36 | visibility on hormonal contraception. Through a review of scientific | 36 | visibility on hormonal contraception. Through a review of scientific | ||
| 37 | literature, this paper reconstructs the debate over whether and how | 37 | literature, this paper reconstructs the debate over whether and how | ||
| 38 | NRT genetic tests should enter the distribution system of | 38 | NRT genetic tests should enter the distribution system of | ||
| 39 | pharmacological contraception. The main arguments concern their | 39 | pharmacological contraception. The main arguments concern their | ||
| 40 | epidemiological, social, economic, and clinical consequences of these | 40 | epidemiological, social, economic, and clinical consequences of these | ||
| 41 | risk factors. We analyze this debate as a process consisting in | 41 | risk factors. We analyze this debate as a process consisting in | ||
| 42 | shaping the risk visibility. To those who opt for selective | 42 | shaping the risk visibility. To those who opt for selective | ||
| 43 | thrombophilia screening, this test should become a part of the medical | 43 | thrombophilia screening, this test should become a part of the medical | ||
| 44 | decision-making process, and its visibility should be kept under | 44 | decision-making process, and its visibility should be kept under | ||
| 45 | medical control to protect contraception safety. To advocates of | 45 | medical control to protect contraception safety. To advocates of | ||
| 46 | universal or \u201cextended\u201d screening, NRT visibility becomes a | 46 | universal or \u201cextended\u201d screening, NRT visibility becomes a | ||
| 47 | moral/legal obligation, and the test a valuable, if not mandatory, | 47 | moral/legal obligation, and the test a valuable, if not mandatory, | ||
| 48 | means to assure contraception safety. Risk visibility reveals | 48 | means to assure contraception safety. Risk visibility reveals | ||
| 49 | assumptions about medical power, women\u2019s responsibility, and drug | 49 | assumptions about medical power, women\u2019s responsibility, and drug | ||
| 50 | safety, and points to an appraisal process as an ideal field to | 50 | safety, and points to an appraisal process as an ideal field to | ||
| 51 | explore political and epistemological implications of screening." | 51 | explore political and epistemological implications of screening." | ||
| 52 | }, | 52 | }, | ||
| 53 | "groups": [], | 53 | "groups": [], | ||
| 54 | "id": "ede653fb-c1de-47f2-86cb-72b69563eb24", | 54 | "id": "ede653fb-c1de-47f2-86cb-72b69563eb24", | ||
| 55 | "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/13972", | 55 | "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/13972", | ||
| 56 | "isopen": false, | 56 | "isopen": false, | ||
| 57 | "issued_date": "2021-08-11T00:00:00", | 57 | "issued_date": "2021-08-11T00:00:00", | ||
| 58 | "language": [ | 58 | "language": [ | ||
| 59 | "en" | 59 | "en" | ||
| 60 | ], | 60 | ], | ||
| 61 | "license_id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | 61 | "license_id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | ||
| 62 | "license_title": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | 62 | "license_title": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | ||
| 63 | "maintainer": null, | 63 | "maintainer": null, | ||
| 64 | "maintainer_email": null, | 64 | "maintainer_email": null, | ||
| 65 | "metadata_created": "2024-05-30T15:07:18.449422", | 65 | "metadata_created": "2024-05-30T15:07:18.449422", | ||
| n | 66 | "metadata_modified": "2024-05-30T15:07:18.449425", | n | 66 | "metadata_modified": "2024-05-30T15:07:39.737696", |
| 67 | "multilingual_tags": { | 67 | "multilingual_tags": { | ||
| 68 | "en": [ | 68 | "en": [ | ||
| 69 | "Visibility", | 69 | "Visibility", | ||
| 70 | "Risk", | 70 | "Risk", | ||
| 71 | "Screening", | 71 | "Screening", | ||
| 72 | "Controversy", | 72 | "Controversy", | ||
| 73 | "Hormonal contraception", | 73 | "Hormonal contraception", | ||
| 74 | "Medical profession role", | 74 | "Medical profession role", | ||
| 75 | "Adverse drug reactions" | 75 | "Adverse drug reactions" | ||
| 76 | ], | 76 | ], | ||
| 77 | "es": [ | 77 | "es": [ | ||
| 78 | "\u00c9tica m\u00e9dica", | 78 | "\u00c9tica m\u00e9dica", | ||
| 79 | "Salud de la mujer", | 79 | "Salud de la mujer", | ||
| 80 | "Visibility", | 80 | "Visibility", | ||
| 81 | "Risk", | 81 | "Risk", | ||
| 82 | "Screening", | 82 | "Screening", | ||
| 83 | "Controversy", | 83 | "Controversy", | ||
| 84 | "Hormonal contraception", | 84 | "Hormonal contraception", | ||
| 85 | "Medical profession role", | 85 | "Medical profession role", | ||
| 86 | "Adverse drug reactions" | 86 | "Adverse drug reactions" | ||
| 87 | ] | 87 | ] | ||
| 88 | }, | 88 | }, | ||
| 89 | "name": | 89 | "name": | ||
| 90 | -risk-in-visible-the-medical-debate-over-non-rare-thrombophilia-nrt-", | 90 | -risk-in-visible-the-medical-debate-over-non-rare-thrombophilia-nrt-", | ||
| 91 | "notes": null, | 91 | "notes": null, | ||
| n | 92 | "num_resources": 0, | n | 92 | "num_resources": 1, |
| 93 | "num_tags": 0, | 93 | "num_tags": 0, | ||
| 94 | "organization": { | 94 | "organization": { | ||
| 95 | "approval_status": "approved", | 95 | "approval_status": "approved", | ||
| 96 | "created": "2023-09-25T13:00:48.436872", | 96 | "created": "2023-09-25T13:00:48.436872", | ||
| 97 | "description": "El Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes | 97 | "description": "El Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes | ||
| 98 | P\u00fablicos (IPP) es un instituto del CSIC que se cre\u00f3 en 2007, | 98 | P\u00fablicos (IPP) es un instituto del CSIC que se cre\u00f3 en 2007, | ||
| 99 | con el objetivo de generar investigaci\u00f3n cient\u00edfica de | 99 | con el objetivo de generar investigaci\u00f3n cient\u00edfica de | ||
| 100 | excelencia internacional y de gran impacto social en el \u00e1mbito | 100 | excelencia internacional y de gran impacto social en el \u00e1mbito | ||
| 101 | del an\u00e1lisis de las pol\u00edticas p\u00fablicas. \r\n\r\nEl IPP | 101 | del an\u00e1lisis de las pol\u00edticas p\u00fablicas. \r\n\r\nEl IPP | ||
| 102 | tiene como misi\u00f3n la generaci\u00f3n de conocimiento | 102 | tiene como misi\u00f3n la generaci\u00f3n de conocimiento | ||
| 103 | cient\u00edfico en torno al an\u00e1lisis de pol\u00edticas y bienes | 103 | cient\u00edfico en torno al an\u00e1lisis de pol\u00edticas y bienes | ||
| 104 | p\u00fablicos, as\u00ed como su gesti\u00f3n por medio de | 104 | p\u00fablicos, as\u00ed como su gesti\u00f3n por medio de | ||
| 105 | organizaciones privadas, instituciones p\u00fablicas y otros actores | 105 | organizaciones privadas, instituciones p\u00fablicas y otros actores | ||
| 106 | sociales.", | 106 | sociales.", | ||
| 107 | "id": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | 107 | "id": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | ||
| 108 | "image_url": "2023-09-25-110048.431222ipp0.png", | 108 | "image_url": "2023-09-25-110048.431222ipp0.png", | ||
| 109 | "is_organization": true, | 109 | "is_organization": true, | ||
| 110 | "name": "instituto-de-politicas-y-bienes-publicos-ipp-csic", | 110 | "name": "instituto-de-politicas-y-bienes-publicos-ipp-csic", | ||
| 111 | "state": "active", | 111 | "state": "active", | ||
| 112 | "title": "Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes P\u00fablicos | 112 | "title": "Instituto de Pol\u00edticas y Bienes P\u00fablicos | ||
| 113 | (IPP), CSIC", | 113 | (IPP), CSIC", | ||
| 114 | "type": "organization" | 114 | "type": "organization" | ||
| 115 | }, | 115 | }, | ||
| 116 | "owner_org": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | 116 | "owner_org": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | ||
| 117 | "private": false, | 117 | "private": false, | ||
| 118 | "publisher": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | 118 | "publisher": "7ee09a95-0735-4848-8c8a-c17381c4278a", | ||
| 119 | "reference": [ | 119 | "reference": [ | ||
| 120 | "http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept1014", | 120 | "http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept1014", | ||
| 121 | "http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept11771" | 121 | "http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept11771" | ||
| 122 | ], | 122 | ], | ||
| 123 | "relationships_as_object": [], | 123 | "relationships_as_object": [], | ||
| 124 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | 124 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | ||
| t | 125 | "resources": [], | t | 125 | "resources": [ |
| 126 | { | ||||
| 127 | "byte_size": "762,68 kB", | ||||
| 128 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||||
| 129 | "cache_url": null, | ||||
| 130 | "created": "2024-05-30T15:07:39.741677", | ||||
| 131 | "datastore_active": false, | ||||
| 132 | "description": null, | ||||
| 133 | "format": "pdf", | ||||
| 134 | "hash": "", | ||||
| 135 | "id": "64984dde-89cf-45f4-b74b-667fb64f01c9", | ||||
| 136 | "last_modified": null, | ||||
| 137 | "metadata_modified": "2024-05-30T15:07:39.739815", | ||||
| 138 | "mimetype": "application/pdf", | ||||
| 139 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||||
| 140 | "name": | ||||
| 141 | "Appraising_screening_making_risk_in-visible_dataset.pdf", | ||||
| 142 | "name_translated": { | ||||
| 143 | "en": | ||||
| 144 | "Appraising_screening_making_risk_in-visible_dataset.pdf", | ||||
| 145 | "es": | ||||
| 146 | "Appraising_screening_making_risk_in-visible_dataset.pdf" | ||||
| 147 | }, | ||||
| 148 | "package_id": "ede653fb-c1de-47f2-86cb-72b69563eb24", | ||||
| 149 | "position": 0, | ||||
| 150 | "resource_identifier": "", | ||||
| 151 | "resource_relation": [], | ||||
| 152 | "resource_relation-1": "", | ||||
| 153 | "resource_type": null, | ||||
| 154 | "size": null, | ||||
| 155 | "state": "active", | ||||
| 156 | "url": | ||||
| 157 | 261/247857/1/Appraising_screening_making_risk_in-visible_dataset.pdf", | ||||
| 158 | "url_type": null | ||||
| 159 | } | ||||
| 160 | ], | ||||
| 126 | "spatial": [], | 161 | "spatial": [], | ||
| 127 | "state": "draft", | 162 | "state": "draft", | ||
| 128 | "tags": [], | 163 | "tags": [], | ||
| 129 | "theme": [ | 164 | "theme": [ | ||
| 130 | 165 | ||||
| 131 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/ciencia-tecnologia", | 166 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/ciencia-tecnologia", | ||
| 132 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/cultura-ocio", | 167 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/cultura-ocio", | ||
| 133 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/educacion", | 168 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/educacion", | ||
| 134 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/salud", | 169 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/salud", | ||
| 135 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/sector-publico" | 170 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/sector-publico" | ||
| 136 | ], | 171 | ], | ||
| 137 | "title": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | 172 | "title": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | ||
| 138 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | 173 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | ||
| 139 | the pill", | 174 | the pill", | ||
| 140 | "title_translated": { | 175 | "title_translated": { | ||
| 141 | "en": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | 176 | "en": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | ||
| 142 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | 177 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | ||
| 143 | the pill", | 178 | the pill", | ||
| 144 | "es": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | 179 | "es": "Appraising screening, making risk in/visible. The medical | ||
| 145 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | 180 | debate over Non-Rare Thrombophilia (NRT) testing before prescribing | ||
| 146 | the pill" | 181 | the pill" | ||
| 147 | }, | 182 | }, | ||
| 148 | "type": "dataset", | 183 | "type": "dataset", | ||
| 149 | "url": null, | 184 | "url": null, | ||
| 150 | "version": null | 185 | "version": null | ||
| 151 | } | 186 | } |
